Which court case ruled that state bans on contraceptives violated rights to privacy?

The ruling in Griswold v. Connecticut established a significant precedent regarding the rights to privacy, particularly in the context of marital relations and contraception. This landmark case, decided in 1965, involved a Connecticut law that prohibited the use of contraceptives and penalized those who provided information about them. The Supreme Court found that this law violated the constitutional right to marital privacy.

The Court's decision emphasized that the Constitution, while not explicitly stating a right to privacy, contains enumerated rights that imply broader protections, particularly within the context of the Bill of Rights. The justices argued that personal privacy regarding family planning and decisions about contraception is essential to the exercise of individual liberties. This case laid the groundwork for later rulings that further expanded privacy rights, including Roe v. Wade, which addressed a woman's right to choose regarding abortion, indicating a continuing legal interpretation concerning privacy in personal matters.

Remaining choices do not focus on privacy rights in the same way. For instance, the Exclusionary Rule pertains to evidence obtained unlawfully and does not address the issue of contraceptive use. Roe v. Wade expands on privacy rights related to abortion, but it followed Griswold, which first recognized such privacy in the context of contraceptives. The Civil